• CHIEF OF STAFF

    Suzanne Stroh is on the team at vChief.

  • AFFILIATIONS

    Founder and CEO, Legion Group Arts, an international arts and entertainment group. The Legion family of companies is based in Washington, DC. with offices in London and Athens. The Legion Foundation, based in Zurich, meets the needs of Greek children and unaccompanied minor refugees living in Greece.

  • COORDINATES

    Suzanne hails from Michigan, where her family brewed Stroh’s beer for five generations. She lives with her family in the Virginia countryside.

  • Interview with Dan Savage

    Author, activist and “Savage Love” advice columnist chats with Suzanne in the January 2016 issue of Gay & Lesbian Review

    Read Interview

  • Interview with Christina Schlesinger

    Code name Romaine Brooks, Guerrilla Girl artist Christina Schlesinger has never exhibited her Peter Paintings. Until now.

    Learn More

  • More Laurels!

    In May SCOTCH VERDICT picked up its eighth international award in the south of France.
    SCOTCH VERDICT Wins St. Tropez 2015

    Learn More

  • New Laurels!

    SCOTCH VERDICT won the Jury Prize for best screenplay at the NOVA Film Festival in April, 2015.
    NOVA: Jury Award Winner | SCOTCH VERDICT

    Learn More

Waking Up French

Jun 11
RVTopcoatLg

The American dandy who woke up French on her 21st birthday.

Waking Up French

Renée Vivien (1877-1909)

and the French language Revival in Maine

 

June 11 is the birthday of the French Symbolist poet Renée Vivien, who wasn’t really French at all. Nor was she called Renée–at least not by those who loved her, like Violet Shiletto, Eva Palmer, Natalie Barney, Romaine Brooks or Hélène de Rothschild. They called her Paule.


In Memoriam

If you love French language, French film, Cajun music and French culture, join me in making a small donation—anything you can afford—like the one I will make every year on June 11 to the Renée Vivien Poetry Fund, a memorial I set up last year at the University of Maine at Augusta.

Waking up French in the state of Maine has never been easy. Along with their Cajun cousins, Maine’s native French speakers have been scoffed at and discriminated against for decades, according to Chelsea Ray, the UMA French professor who helped to build a French after school program for kids that’s “a symbolic first step as a corrective for this discrimination.” (Annie Murphy of Public Radio International did a great story on it for “The World” back in March. View the PRI story here.)

Ben Levine’s documentary film REVEIL revisits this dark history and lights a creative spark.

Let’s make lasting change by providing funds to seed an arts festival scene in Augusta that will rejoin Cajun music and Acadian dialect in film, theatre and poetry for the young people who want to emerge from the shadows and embrace their French heritage full on, beyond conversation into arts and letters.

Renée Vivien: Petit Paule

She was born Pauline Tarn in London 137 years ago today. Her mother was from Jackson, Michigan. Her father inherited a merchant fortune that Pauline’s mother was determined to control. I’ll pass over her privileged but troubled childhood to the day when she woke up French on her 21st birthday, a bit like Orlando waking up as a woman in Virginia Woolf’s charming novel.

images-1From that moment on, after regaining control of her fortune held in trust, it was across the Channel and no looking back. Pauline escaped her mother’s clutches and moved to Paris to live, breathe and write poetry in French. She took the pen name Renée Vivien for “born again.” Steeped in Greek and in-depth study of French, her poetry was classical (Lucie Delarue-Mardrus and Colette called it old fashioned) and exquisite with decadent Symbolist themes, dragging the 19th century into the 20th and earning her a place in the Pantheon beside Baudelaire.

Another way you can make a real difference in young people’s lives today is to make a small donation—which I am also doing—to UMA’s scholarship fund for the study of French. It’s directed by Chelsea Ray, the UMA French professor who translated Natalie Barney’s 1926 erotic novel.

Here’s a message from Chelsea Ray:

Thank you very much for offering to help with my work at UMA. I work primarily with the Franco-American community here; it is a vibrant community that withstood much discrimination.

I am the only faculty member who teaches French on campus; indeed, I am the second full-time tenured faculty member in any language in the history of UMA. I have created a very efficient program, running 200 and 300 level classes at the same time and bringing teaching assistants from the University of Western Brittany to UMA each year. We do not have dorms or any student housing whatsoever (UMA is the only public campus in the UMaine system not to have housing), so I am obliged to also locate host families for the French students, or locate “starter families” to help them get settled. As chair of the International Advocacy Committee, I have my work cut out for me, especially in a state like Maine where students often do not feel drawn to international issues and have no funds to travel.

The best way to help my work would be to donate online to the newly endowed Marcel Raymond Scholarship for the Study of French at UMA. It allows UMA students to travel to France for the first time, on an immersion exchange with the University of Western Brittany. These students often have little to no funds for travel; they can barely take off a weekend of working, let alone three weeks. This fund will provide two students with funding for travel, participation in our annual immersion weekend program, or other immersion opportunities.

I hope you will consider this option, and encourage others to do the same.

If you have additional questions, contact Staci Warren in the Office of University Advancement: (207) 621-3299.

I think that this scholarship fund can be seen certainly in the spirit of Renée Vivien herself, who was so inspired by the study of French.

I cannot thank you enough for your generosity and help in supporting French at UMA.

Best wishes, Chelsea

“In the Spirit of Renée Vivien Herself”

Starting rich and ending ruined shortly thereafter, the poet’s life was Bohemian by any standard. Think of her as a female Rimbaud who dressed like Hamlet, attracted rich and powerful lesbians then carried them up four flights of stairs, according to Lily de Gramont. She was very pretty and very addicted to chloral hydrate. So addicted, it seems, that her body failed to respond in lovemaking with Natalie Barney, the love of her life. Unknown-2

Natalie was highly sexed and sought her pleasures elsewhere. Pauline, as a pure Romantic, struggled with Natalie’s classical attitude to love and sex. In the end, she left Natalie for infidelity and wrote a very bad crepuscular novel about their split, A Woman Appeared to Me, which perhaps unwittingly centers around the next woman in her life, Romaine Brooks.

The breakup with Barney sent Pauline spinning out of control. Brooks bailed. Hélène de Rothschild, now Baroness van Zuylen van Nyevelt and still immensely rich in spite of having been disinherited for marrying outside the faith, tried to right Pauline’s ship with equal doses of travel, domesticity and self-publishing. It didn’t work. Hélène fell in love with another woman, took Pauline off her payroll and moved to Lisbon.

Late in 1908 we find Pauline ravaged by drugs, emaciated by anorexia, broke and suicidal, still tortured by her rejecting love of Natalie Barney, and dangerously addicted to sadomasochism, according to Colette in The Pure and the Impure. The sex addiction was an irony Natalie Barney never accepted. She told Colette that she didn’t agree with Colette’s take on Renée. The truth was too much for Natalie to bear, even though she suffered from a milder case of sex addiction herself.

Natalie arrived on Pauline’s doorstep with flowers one morning in 1909 to find her dead at 32. Hélène took the nosegay and blocked the door. Natalie walked a block and fainted on a park bench. Recovering her senses, she sought comfort in the arms of the second great love of her life, Lily de Gramont. There she confessed her guilt over Pauline’s death, caused (she believed) by the chronic infidelity that Natalie was powerless over. Lily was an atheist who decided, there and then, to grant Natalie absolution. It was obvious to Lily that Natalie’s guilt had the power to destroy her, and Lily refused to let that happen. They were together from that moment for life, until Lily’s death in 1954.

In the middle of that remarkable love story flowered another, equally beautiful, perennial love. Natalie and Romaine Brooks met in 1916. Their shared possession of the dead Pauline was a simple reality in their love story, which also lasted a lifetime from that moment, until Romaine closed the door in preparation for her own death in 1970 at 96. Natalie followed two years later, also aged 96.

Unknown-1In translating the biography of Élisabeth de Gramont (Hélène’s cousin), I see evidence that both women, Romaine Brooks and Lily de Gramont, spent considerable amounts of time protecting Natalie from herself and from the ghost of Renée Vivien, a great American poet who kept failing at life. Her major subject, like Poe’s, was death.

Requiescat in pace. May you wake up in French.


The after school French program at Sherwood Heights Elementary School in Auburn, Maine, is where kids learn the local French their forbears have spoken for generations. You know, like in Evangeline, that gorgeous 1847 poem by Portland-born Henry Wadsworth Longfellow that I had to memorize in sixth grade:

This is the forest primeval. The murmuring pines and the hemlocks,
Bearded with moss, and in garments green, indistinct in the twilight,
Stand like Druids of old, with voices sad and prophetic,
Stand like harpers hoar, with beards that rest on their bosoms.
Loud from its rocky caverns, the deep-voiced neighboring ocean
Speaks, and in accents disconsolate answers the wail of the forest.

–Henry Wadsworth Longfellow, Evangeline

So haunting. Renée Vivien must have loved it. Brother and sister recite it together in Patience, Book 1 of my quintet of novels, TABOU. (You can buy TABOU for your eReader on the Books page of this website.) Now, I learn, Evangeline wasn’t just a saga. It was a protest poem against British treatment of French natives in Acadia, now Nova Scotia.

Le Grand Dérangement

Acadiens were French emigrés to Canada whose culture and language developed independently of the Québecois. Retaining elements of Vivien’s beloved 17th century French, Acadian French is a lost dialect everywhere else in Canada and in France.

As for the Acadiens themselves, their Arcadia in Acadia was short lived. After three generations, the region was conquered and Acadiens lived under British rule for another generation and a half until 1775, when they were expelled from Canada. Many drifted down into Maine and settled south of the Kennebec; others ended up as Cajuns in Louisiana.

Rockland-based filmmaker Ben Levine wanted to understand “what it meant to be French” for the descendants of these Acadiens. His documentary REVEIL explores “how they felt about losing French and what they could do to bring it back. The older generation is retired now. They were working class people with an oral culture that inherited its strengths and weaknesses from being isolated by the English.” But discrimination was everywhere. “Frog” was an ethnic slur. Levine uncovered evidence of Ku Klux Klan involvement in the 1920s to eradicate French culture from Maine. Cajun Acadiens suffered the same discrimination that has informed their music ever since.

“For the younger generation,” Levine says, “we see the waking up process, [realizing] that they are French and still can be French.” They have reclaimed the slur, calling themselves Farogs. The broader community is now mainstreaming more and gathering  together, from the Upper St. John Valley (historically, home to the Acadiens) to the industrial mill towns of Southern and Central Maine: Biddeford, Lewiston, Augusta and Waterville (historically, home to Americans of French descent).

The film, subtitled WAKING UP FRENCH, has staying power. “Even now we’re still showing it to public audiences,” says Levine, witnessing the French cultural revival stretching from Louisiana up to Maine, cross-pollinating with the thriving Cajun music scene. “We’ve got bands singing in New England French. There’s singer Zachary Richard. There’s Greg Chabot, the playwright. Marie Cormier is producing French plays. Denis Ledoux is a Franco-American writer living in Lewiston.”

“There’s a whole younger generation of Franco-American writers now,” says Levine’s co-producer Julia Schulz. “It’s an exciting literary movement.” I can see a natural blend of well-attended poetry readings and music festivals on the horizon when Levine adds: “We’re seeing French majors who become high school French teachers. They do their PhDs in linguistics, then they do more research.”

All this means that the oral culture which has kept Acadian French dormant into the internet age is about to flower in arts and letters. Worldwide, 300 million people speak French in 29 countries where it is an official language. For the Farogs down east, the days of secrecy and shame are over.

Vive l'Acadie! The flag of the New England Acadiens.

Vive l’Acadie! The flag of the New England Acadiens.

 

Ben Levine has produced three films with Julia Schulz on language loss. Working as far afield as Oaxaca, Mexico, they receive NSF grants to document and revive lost languages. Their upcoming documentary will be set on the PasSamaquoddy reservation.
Chelsea Ray established the text of Natalie Barney’s 1926 novel Amants féminins ou la troisième from manuscripts and typescripts (Paris: ErosOnyx 2013). She teaches French at the University of Maine at Augusta. She also works with the local Franco-American community and advocates its concerns at the Franco-American caucus of the Maine legislature.

Natalie Barney: As Elusive as Ever

Jun 9

images-2As Elusive as Ever

Update on the lost film footage

Last month you saw the first and only known film clip of Natalie Barney, speaking at home about Mata Hari, the subject of a 1996 British documentary. Since then, my tireless assistant Nikki Grigsby has been on the case to hunt down the source footage. Results: nil. She has queried twelve sources and archives. It was disturbing to learn that five of them (NASA, the Imperial War Museum, the New York Fire Department, the Library of Congress, and ABC Capital Cities Inc.) “were unusable in obtaining any information for us as they either have no film archives or they had no means of contacting them for inquiries.” American Pathé News, which seemed among the most promising, has not returned our calls or letters. “BBC Motion Gallery does not share copies of BBC Programs and footage to members of the public for research, education or personal use.”  (???)

barneyWe’re left with the National Archives, the David Bruce papers in Richmond and two other, slightly promising leads. We all want to see and hear what else was in that interview, but Moonbeam is proving as elusive as ever. Please stand by. And thank you, Nikki.

 

 

Natalie Barney Speaks

May 5

rap-cover

Screen Shot 2014-05-05 at 4.46.33 PM

Natalie Barney talking on film about Mata Hari, date unknown. The location has been verified by Jean Chalon as 20, rue Jacob.

Natalie Speaks

Lost Film Footage Found by Italian researcher

I had heard rumors that an audio recording existed of Natalie Barney. Like everyone else, I longed to hear her voice and listen to her speaking. Last week, Natalie’s friend and biographer Jean Chalon very kindly forwarded this link sent to him by Italian researcher Giulia Napoleone. Jean was as surprised as anyone to learn that Natalie had actually been filmed at home, 20 rue Jacob, looking just as he remembered her and wearing clothes he recognized. Jean Chalon met Barney on a damp Wednesday afternoon at 28 in late 1963. He was a journalist surprised to learn that the author of the book he was given to review, Traits and Portraits, was still alive. He walked through wet streets and dead leaves to present himself at teatime for their first interview. She asked his age; he blushed when giving it, not knowing what to call Miss Barney. Charmed, she came to his rescue, and thus began the decade of Wednesday afternoons they spent together before her death in 1972.

Here she is commenting on Mata Hari, in a 37-second film clip used in the British television documentary, “Great Mysteries and Myths of the 20th Century: Mata Hari” (1996 dir. Philip Nugus).

Mata Hari was a Dutch-born army officer’s wife who had fled colonial life in Sumatra to reinvent herself around the turn of the century when she became the toast of le tout Paris. She had frequently entertained Natalie and her garden-party guests in the nude, perhaps offering slightly different pleasures. At any rate, the famous WWI German spy immortalized by Greta Garbo was, apparently, nothing of the sort. Sexually voracious and self-promoting? Yes. A beautiful dancer of questionable judgment who “produced herself too much”? Yes, according to Natalie Barney, who says Mata Hari had no idea what danger she had gotten herself into. Trading sex for secrets? Probably not.

According to facts presented in this documentary, Mata Hari was imprisioned and tried by a military tribunal that was neither required to present evidence nor to admit that the French had, themselves, hired her to spy on Germany by seducing German officers. It appears that Mata Hari’s German targets realized she was a spy and set her up with a false code name, “H-21.”  French listeners on the Eiffel Tower intercepted transmissions they took for evidence of Mata Hari’s guilt, but the intercepts were doctored by the fanatical prosecutor bent on providing the French army with a scapegoat in the darkest days of war, following bitter defeats, heavy losses, low morale and mutiny on the battlefield.

Mata Hari’s own lovers protested her innocence at her trial, but by then she had “confessed” after a month of “harsh questioning” in prison. Her lawyer tried in vain to stay her execution, claiming she was pregnant with his child. Rumors swirled around Paris after her excecution, including a report that she had gone to her death naked beneath an ermine coat. It was Natalie Barney who verified that Mata Hari had been executed wearing a simple white suit (which, by the way, is NOT what the executed “spy” is wearing in this documentary, throwing suspicion over the whole piece.)

What’s more, the narrator identifies Barney incorrectly, which may be why the clip has not been searchable under “Natalie Barney” on YouTube. (Search under Mata Hari.)

I know nothing more about this interview, when and why it was conducted, by whom, or where the raw footage exists. I will do my best to find out. As far as I know, it is the only existing film or audio recording of Natalie.

Many thanks, Giulia and Jean, for passing it on.

Mata Hari before….

Dutch-born sexual adventurer Mata Hari before….

 

 

 

 

…during...

…during…

…and after her imprisonment, trail and conviction on trumped-up spy charges in 1917

…and after her imprisonment, trial and conviction on trumped-up spy charges during World War I. Refusing a blindfold and chatting with her French executioners until shots were fired, she was killed by firing squad in 1917.

 

 

Corps a Corps with Romaine Brooks

May 1

romaine

1 May 2014
Photo: George Hoyningen-Huene

Photo: George Hoyningen-Huene

Corps à Corps with Romaine Brooks

Tête à tête with her biographer, Cassandra Langer

Suzanne Stroh: Thanks for popping by the site yesterday, and welcome back. It’s been six months since we talked on Natalie’s birthday. You’ve finished your biography of Romaine Brooks. Perfect timing; today is her 140th birthday. If today was 97 years ago in 1917, Natalie Barney would be taking her leave of Lily de Gramont after celebrating their anniversary in the morning, and looking for Romaine with a birthday cake in her arms. Where would we find her, and what would she be doing?

Cassandra Langer: She seems to have enjoyed traveling this time of year. She liked roaming around the Algerian countryside, or else making new forays in Italy, her spiritual home. It’s a little too early in the season after such a cold winter to spy on her swimming in the Blue Grotto on Capri, where she had a villa, but we might find her sunbathing on a rock in the arms of a pretty woman, like Lily de Gramont did in the early 1920s when she visited Romaine.

Lily wrote Natalie Barney that she liked looking at Romaine’s legs.

Who didn’t? (Laughs.) Natalie was encouraging a love affair between them.

She’d call it a corps à corps.

She took that letter for evidence that they’d gotten together.

Do you think they ever were lovers?

I can’t say. Not yet, anyway. But new information about Romaine is turning up all the time. I’ve made so many new discoveries since last year, and a whole new Romaine has emerged. We never knew her. This is a person who has been misrepresented in biography and in art history. She has been presented as a misanthrope, a recluse and somebody incapable of really intimate relationships. None of it is true.

images-1As we can see, looking over there on that rock by the sea, with Lily edging closer!

Romaine knew Lily long before she met Natalie Barney in October 1916. They were friends. Lily sat in Romaine’s box at the opera. They’d known one another for a decade at least. Then, in 1918, their lives took a new turn. Romaine and Natalie had fallen in love, but Natalie was also still very much in love with Lily. The situation came to a flash point. Natalie and Lily married in secret. Romaine had a decision to make.

Did Romaine ever consider walking away from Natalie?

No, there was no question in Romaine’s mind that Natalie was the love of her life. Natalie wrote to Lily defiantly that she alone would decide whether to leave Romaine, and she never did. They were kindred spirits. They felt they were both “double beings.” Romaine was Natalie’s “Angel,” in the sense of an ideal being who possesses masculine and feminine qualities in equal measure. So the issue was really how to build a life that would suit all three women. By the time Lily visited Romaine on Capri, they had been organizing their lives around one another without incident for nearly a decade. They were a happy threesome.

The stable triangle that Natalie writes about in her 1926 roman à clef, Amants féminins ou la troisième, contrasting the unstable, destructive love triangle she gets involved in. She never showed the book to anyone, because Lily and Romaine were the keys.

And Romaine was intensely private. If Lily was the stable, organizing principle that held the system together, and Natalie was the nurturing unconditional love, Romaine was the protector. She didn’t want them being talked about. She hated gossip and she wasn’t going to open herself up to it. My book goes into this in detail.

It’s to be published next spring in 2015, right?

Yes. Meanwhile, I’m helping other biographers deal with the difficulties in writing about GLBT subjects, especially historical ones like Romaine who veiled their own family lives—domestically and emotionally. If they recorded them at all.

Which of course were not recorded by their contemporaries, either.

Right. I’ll take part in a panel discussion about that at the BIO International Conference in Boston on May 17th. Anyway, how did you spend your birthday?

Let’s see. What have I been up to? (Rummages through papers on desk.)

No good, I see. (Laughs.)

You gave me your birth details, and I took the liberty of consulting an astrologer to compare your chart with Romaine’s. Only we don’t have the time of birth for Romaine.

That’s something I’d really like to hunt down. Anybody who can help will be doing me a huge favor.

Jo Cooke, the British astrologer I contacted, used a complex method to estimate Romaine’s birth time as 4:34 in the morning. So we’ll have to go with that. Jo is a journalist who overcame her skepticism and trained up in astrology. She has worked pretty extensively with groups of artistic people linked in complex relationships, like in the Bloomsbury group. That matches up pretty well with the complexity in Romaine’s life.

I have to admit, I know very little about astrology. But this is intriguing, partly because I have had to use intuition all along to investigate Romaine’s life. Any insight is welcome. So tell me what you came up with. Would Romaine and I get along?

She seems to think the two of you share some important characteristics, based on your astrology. Tell me if any of this rings a bell.

Okay.

You and Romaine share a reluctance to reveal much about the origins of your creative drive. How did you find out what drove and inspired Romaine?

That’s uncanny, and it’s true. How did I discover Romaine’s aesthetics? I found out by reasoning backwards. Her friendship with Gertrude Stein is well documented. In the mid 1930s they spent time together in New York, when Gertrude was in America promoting a best seller. The two women had always disagreed about Cubism in general and Picasso in particular, whose work Stein championed and Brooks disdained, thinking he was wasting his talent. So art theory was an ongoing conversation between them. Romaine wrote a letter to Natalie describing everything she hated about Gertrude’s aesthetics, listing the principles of Stein’s that she disagreed with. It was a scathing critique, and it even contained racial slurs. So this was a passionate outpouring of Romaine’s feelings and philosophy. By learning what she rejected, I was able to ascertain her positive values. From there, it was a matter of tracking her development by connecting dots in her biography where I could find them.

Lily de Gramont wrote a short, intimate and insightful introduction to one of Romaine’s exhibitions. That essay made it sound like everyone knew Brooks was influenced by Whistler.

Romaine Brooks was highly esteemed and much better known in her own day than she is today. As for Whistler, it’s true. She studied his work in London in 1903-4 and when you put Whistlers alongside Brookses, you can see the affinities. You can see what Romaine was aiming for, and in some cases even surpassed. She was the only woman working in the era with the audacity to produce big portraits of culturally significant subjects that could hold up against Whistlers and Sargents. These were huge canvases. Difficult to paint under any circumstances. Much harder to control such vast surfaces at the highest quality standards she held herself to. Romaine Brooks was a perfectionist.

Your charts show compatibility. Like for instance, you can both be trusted with secrets, and neither of you is shocked by taboos.

Otherwise, how could I have lasted this long with Romaine Brooks? (Laughs.)

And there are complimentary differences. Romaine, like Lily, had the assertiveness and relentless drive of her type of Taurean, which is pretty rampant. I mean look at all those planets and things she has in Taurus. The sun, the ascendant, Venus and Mars, Pluto and even something called the true node. Whereas your type is more cautious, more apt to take measured steps. What do you make of that?

Pretty accurate. Ok, I’m now more interested in astrology than I was before. She’s got three planets right next door in Aries. Mercury, Chiron and Neptune. Obviously there’s an intensity suggested there that is totally Romaine.

So how did you interpret Romaine’s volatility?

With caution! I see here that Jo Cooke describes Romaine as an extremely loyal person who could wither you with a glance if you crossed her, if not destroy you in outrage. This is totally on the mark. Perhaps it takes somebody like me to patiently build the case that has never been made before, which is that most of Romaine’s outbursts were her way of blowing off steam under extreme pressure. I looked carefully for signs of that pressure, and I found them. So yes, Romaine could be quite rude, and Natalie was the first to warn people of that.

Lily just took her in stride.

Kindred Spirits, "double beings"

Kindred spirits, “double beings”

Of course. Look, Lily’s got almost as many planets in Taurus and Aries herself. Jo points out how perfect they both were for Natalie, being so grounded and comfortable being alone with themselves, which is so appealing to a Scorpio. And of course you need that independence when you’re shuttling between two women. Conversely, for Romaine, with Venus and Mars so close together in the same house, Natalie was the perfect partner for somebody whose sex drive was unquenchable. (Points to notes from meeting with Jo Cooke.) What does that say?

“You would be crazy to turn down a night with Romaine Brooks.”

That’s so interesting, because Romaine never wrote about their sex life. She wrote about their family life—what gifts to give Romaine’s nieces and nephews, how to manage their joint Swiss bank account, when to spend time at the house they built together near St. Tropez. Her way of indicating how close she felt to Natalie was telling us they wound their watches together sitting on a park bench.

Do you think Romaine was interested in astrology?

We know she believed in spirits. She sketched angels, devils and spirit worlds from childhood. It’s safe to say she had mystical experiences. She’d been steeped in the occult from birth by her mother, who fashionably indulged in all the pseudo sciences of the era and even had a live-in psychic after the death of Romaine’s brother. Romaine grew up in a house with séances, spiritualists, table lifting, esoteric magazine subscriptions, obsession with Houdini, you name it.

Her mother took a young lover who killed himself after she rejected him, and much time was spent with a medium trying to contact this guy in the beyond to get his forgiveness. Romaine’s mother and brother died within a year of one another, and as much of a realist as Romaine was, she felt haunted by them for the rest of her life.

Menaced. Which triggered her fears that she had inherited their mental illness.

Yes. So we can see acceptance that her life was affected by esoteric factors beyond her understanding.

Did she take as active an interest in astrology or the Tarot as Natalie or Lily? Don’t know. We do know that none of these women was a Freudian, even though they had friends who had been analyzed by Freud. They all went against the grain in that regard. Freudianism was the predominant psychological system of their day, and while Romaine acknowledges an understanding of “the subconscious,” there’s no evidence that she felt Freud’s philosophy or experiments adequately explained the human condition, let alone people’s behavior. It’s hard for us to understand today how radical this was, rejecting Freudian psychology, but it was. Romaine saw herself as a martyr, and it’s definitely true that her artistic reputation was sacrificed for her open, unapologetic Sapphism.

The classical term for lesbianism.

Half pagans, half classicists: that was Natalie and Romaine.

No regrets and no surrender. That was Lily too. What else strikes you in this astrological profile?

Well, Romaine has been portrayed as severe, withdrawn and cold, even “reptilian,” according to the English art critic John Usher. She was severe. Rigorous, demanding people are not easy to live with, even if they only demand perfection of themselves. But Somerset Maugham called her “Romantic Romaine,” and I never knew why. I’m surprised to see clues in this chart. So for instance, the perfect birthday present for me, according to Jo, is some cool gadget like a MacBook Air.

Spot on.

But here, for Romaine, it says that the perfect birthday present to give Romaine is a bubble bath with tea lights, champagne and oysters, followed by sex all night. There’s a lot of warmth, a lot of emotion, a lot of sustained intimacy in that picture. It squares with Romaine’s demands that Natalie not squander her attention and resources on Dolly Wilde, for instance.

In their own home!

Exactly. Romaine kept her own Paris apartment and studio (by the way, it was in the same building as Laura Barney’s and just up the street from Lily’s house), but she expected Natalie to make a home for her when Romaine visited Paris. She liked hanging around having quiet chats in the kitchen with Berthe, the cook. She expected 24/7 access rights to Natalie’s bedroom. She needed romantic attention.

Natalie speaks! This YouTube excerpt may be the first time anyone alive has seen film footage of Natalie Barney interviewed at home about Mata Hari in a documentary produced by Philip Nugus. Many thanks to researcher Giulia Napoleone for tracking it down. And thanks to Jean Chalon for confirming that the location is 20, rue Jacob and that the speaker is Natalie Barney, looking just as he remembers her. In days to come, I hope to learn more about this film shoot and gather more footage.

Letter from Romaine Brooks to Berthe Cleyrergue, Natalie Barney's cook, requesting that Berthe return her notebooks or else destroy them. What was in them and what happened to them? The mystery continues.  (Collection: C. Langer)

Letter from Romaine Brooks to Berthe Cleyrergue, Natalie Barney’s cook, requesting that Berthe return her notebooks or else destroy them. What was in them, why did she want them back and what happened to them? Brooks had been considered an incidental draftsman until a newly-found audio recording, the only recorded interview Brooks ever gave, established that she drew all her life. But only a small portion of her estimated output of drawings and sketches is known to exist. The mystery continues. (Collection: C. Langer)

Let’s give Romaine a new reputation for her 140th birthday. Where do we start?

First, let’s give her general appreciation for her work and young viewers. Today’s art lovers are open to subject matter that shocked Romaine’s contemporaries. People no longer see her depictions of bold, strong women as taboo. Photography dominates portraiture today. Think of the work of Cindy Sherman, for instance. Why not bring back painted portraiture that’s equally arresting? What’s more, realism itself isn’t tainted any more. Since Hitler had declared abstract art to be “degenerate,” there was a backlash after World War II, when realism was rejected, tarred with the brush of fascism. In the second half of the 20th century, you had to be an abstract painter to get critical acclaim. Meanwhile, the work of great realists was being forgotten or passed over. That’s over now. Realism is hip again. Finally, people will be interested to see that Romaine’s drawings predated Picasso by 50 years or more.

What?

Yes, critics wanted to bury Romaine in the 19th century with Symbolism, maybe because she sometimes dressed like Rimbaud and one of her girlfriends, Renée Vivien, is considered a great French Symbolist poet. Like Brooks, Vivien was an expatriate lesbian living in Paris, and a famous lover of Natalie Barney. So I guess people just thought it would be convenient to lump them all together. But Eduard McAvoy hailed Brooks as the first Surrealist. She was really in advance of much of the art she later disdained as unfulfilling abstraction. She had already digested those ideas and moved on.

So she’s getting a total makeover.

She’s very chic in France, you know. She’s seen as an innovator in black, white and grey, the palette that dominates so much modern design. Brooks is a byword of good taste. Critics accused Romaine’s work of coldness because of the limited palette. Today her paintings seem monumental.

Should we give her a coming out party?

Let’s stick to a major retrospective exhibition. In her own day, Romaine’s reluctance to come forward as a celebrity, like Balthus, worked against her. Today, this is pretty refreshing. We’re glutted with vapid celebrity. It’s great to have an enigma on our hands. Terrific to grapple again with some mystery.

Would she come to her own retrospective?

Oh yes, I think so. She would be proud. Woe to the curator who would have to paint the gallery and hang the show with her! And Romaine would hope they’d publish her memoirs alongside. She’d want Lily as her PR agent. But she’d arrive at the opening in a trouser suit of her own design, she’d be happy to give interviews and sign books, and Natalie would be greeting people and directing them toward the paintings. Lily would be explicating and Romaine would be holding her own, flirting, joking, telling anecdotes just like in the interview we finally unearthed at the Archives of American Art. Charming.

Who goes home with whom?

It’s May 1st. Natalie goes home with Romaine.

Photo: ginnieblogspot.com

Photo: ginnieblogspot.com

 

Cassandra Langer’s book, All or Nothing: Romaine Brooks (1874-1970) will be published in 2015 by University of Wisconsin Press.
Jo Cooke is a journalist and astrologer. Learn more at www.jocookeastrologer.com.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Barney and Gramont: Binary Star System

Apr 30

 

30 April 2014
ElizGramont3 copy

Mapping the Barney/Gramont/Brooks household with Suzanne Stroh on the outside. Three women, Gramont, Barney and Stroh, were/are first born daughters. Charts by A.T. Mann

Binary Star System

Èlisabeth de gramont and natalie Barney

115 years ago today in Paris, two remarkable women were rummaging through their wardrobes looking for something to wear on their first date. Both were in the avant-garde. Radical elites. First-born daughters.

Élisabeth de Gramont, the married mother of two daughters of her own, had just turned 34 the week before. She was a charming, high energy marquise who would one day be a duchess; a music patron who regularly attended science lectures at the Sorbonne and supported the work of Marie Curie; and a leftist intellectual who lived in palaces and consorted with Marxists.

This year she would give the French world its first translations of Keats. Her friends called her Lily.

Lily de Gramont might have rushed home to change after consulting her fortuneteller in the rue de Rome. Like the blonde, athletic woman whose dinner invitation she had accepted last week, gadabout Lily had always been interested in astrology, numerology and the tarot (but for different reasons). The heated debate over whether these ancient pursuits—astrology studies the movement of the stars and planets—were arts or sciences, both or neither, was never resolved in her lifetime. Lily’s sun was in Taurus. Her moon in Scorpio.

A theatrical streak and a night to remember

Thirty-two year-old Natalie Barney had the sun in Scorpio, the moon in Aries and a theatrical streak. “One of her favorite outfits was a long velvet dress emblazoned with astrological signs,” writes her biographer, Suzanne Rodriguez. Natalie was a clever, arty, energetic and culturally voracious American heiress from Cincinnati. She spoke perfect 18th century French after having settled in Paris with her sister around the turn of the century following boarding school at Les Ruches near Barbizon.

Natalie had not yet settled into her new home. It was a Left Bank location, 20 rue Jacob, which would soon become a literary landmark on the map of world capitals. Having Lily de Gramont for supper was one of her first acts as a hostess in this house. Formal, controlled and even cool on the outside, her steamy personal and sexual life was always in disarray. Even her decorating was a bit of a jumble; the small house was lit downstairs like an aquarium capped by a blue bedroom where Natalie hoped to unpetal Lily before the night was through. She would compensate for aesthetic disharmony with good food and excellent wine. Both women were Epicureans with a classical approach to life.

barneyLily’s childhood (and best) friend, the French poet Lucie Delarue-Mardrus, had recently introduced them. A few years earlier, as Lily well knew, Lucie had joyously offered Natalie her gay virginity. Natalie had taken it with enthusiasm, along with Lucie’s innocence. Barney was irresistible and passionate about the transformative possibilities of erotic love between women. The problem was, she was openly unfaithful. Nothing would ever transform Natalie Barney into a monogamist. She was “indifferent to everything except the free play of her life,” Lily admitted in her 1931 memoir, Years of Plenty. So Lucie had dumped Natalie in bitterness; now they were slowly rebuilding a friendship that would last for life.

What was in store tonight? Lily had never kissed a girl before. Her biographer, Francesco Rapazzini, writes that she had been waiting for the right woman. Was this the one? Natalie had been notorious now for ten years at least, dating back to her affair with the Angelina Jolie of the Belle Époque, courtesan Liane de Pougy, who raked in a small fortune from her tell-all memoir about it. Seeking a more stable fan base, Natalie had since built a Platonic friendship with one of France’s most influential daily columnists, the tastemaker Remy de Gourmont. It was Gourmont who made her famous by giving her the nickname that stuck for a century: l’Amazone.

And then Lily might have found herself ducking into the Amazon’s courtyard off the rue Jacob, taking note of the garden gone to seed and the listing Greek temple hulking off to the side. There she was on the Amazon’s doorstep, tapping her foot at the appointed hour. Natalie would later compare Élisabeth to “a climbing rose with its roots in one garden but who blossoms in another.”

Their letters tell us that two women dined and laughed together, inspirited one another, made heavenly love almost nonstop through the night, and awakened in one another’s arms sometime the next day, having lit an undying flame. Lily believed she had been reborn with a new, sixth sense for pleasure; Natalie suspected she’d always possessed it.

Binary stars, eternal mates

Natalie would test the flame’s durability over the years. She found it to be inextinguishable and necessary for making her life into the work of art she dreamed of. For three decades until Lily’s death in 1954, they would celebrate May 1st as their anniversary. They were never exclusive lovers, and except for a few months after Lily left her husband, they never lived together in the same house. But each had found in the other an “eternal mate.” Natalie described their love as a binary star system in the novel she wrote in 1926 and never published during her lifetime. (Today you can read it in French from ErosOnyx as Amants féminins ou la troisième. And since this post was originally written, it has been published in English as Women Lovers, or The Third Woman.) Imagining the extinction of their flame by the inevitable death of one woman, Natalie wrote of her grief as a cosmological cataclysm: the death of a star.

One hundred fifteen years later, in celebration Lily’s and Natalie’s anniversary on the heels of the tremendously exciting new discoveries in cosmology made in March, I have finally dipped my toe into the “antimatter”—the black hole where astrology might someday meet cosmology. Now, before you roll your eyes, or even shout that “astrology is superstition not science!”, hear me out. I will not contradict you.

My own interest seems to mirror that of many established experts. These are highly numerate people, trained in serious professions from the sciences to engineering and philosophy, who have been wondering all along whether astrology may someday be found to have a scientific grounding. Does Einstein’s theory of relativity—and the acceptance of timespace as a universal concept—indicate that there are quantum effects of gravity? (The new inflation theory discovery seems to be saying there are. Reported and explained fairly well here in Stanford News.) If there are quantum effects of gravity, then why would we not be curious about whether the building materials of very tiny biological organisms here on Earth are affected by it? This is not a crazy question for a humanist or a natural historian, let alone a physicist, a neurologist or a psychiatrist to ask. It’s certainly an age-old question that has been posed, in one way or another, by many cultures seeking deeper understanding of the forces that shape and drive human beings. In fact, it’s safe to say that every woman wonders about this, for instance, whenever she reckons with the moon, along with other unperceivable limbic factors, affecting her menstrual cycle. Physicists have a concept for it as it occurs with all types of vibrations, including tidal waves and waves that exist in tiny materials. They call it resonance.

Putting the predictive or proscriptive aspects of astrology aside, I’ve wondered (along with Lily and Natalie) whether what we consider esoteric factors—factors present at conception—give insight into the forces (resonances?) that brought these two women together on this day 115 years ago.

resonant theories

To learn more and have some fun, I consulted an esteemed expert, astrologer A.T. Mann, an architect-turned-author particularly interested in astrology’s physics-based TOE (theory of everything).

Mann modeled the spiraling movement of our solar system, and thinking in terms of timespace, he uses that model to test whether certain astrological properties describe specific resonances with other times and other places. Traveling “back” on the spiral, you see where the same resonance would also have been “felt” in history. If you’ve ever felt attracted to the arts, letters, math, science, philosophy or culture of certain historical periods, this may begin to explain why. The cells in your body that you’ve inherited in your genome may be resonating the same way they did then and there, based on where you are “today” in the solar system. (And remember, if we wanted to act like good scientists and ask how we would measure that, we’re probably talking about measuring any quantum effects of gravity upon you at the moment of conception. We still don’t have instruments for that yet.) This place, unique to you, closely mirrors places the solar system has been along its spiraling travels before, and will be again. In a weird way, you may really “feel like” people did 300 years ago, 1,000 years ago, or 10,000 years ago, when others (located in a different place on the timespace spiral) just don’t “resonate with that.” Change is accelerating in human history, so some resonances, when located “nearby” in antiquity and modern history, may be very distinctive. You may be into Renaissance or Medieval or Greco-Roman culture, for instance, when other people just can’t see what you see in it. Resonance may be part of the reason why.

Have you ever met somebody and felt you knew them instantly, fully, totally? Whatever may be found to cause that feeling, this is the kind of resonance, or gut reaction, that may be the basis of what some people call the “law of attraction.” Lily and Natalie often told friends that this is what happened to them when they met at Lucie’s house. Natalie’s friend and biographer Jean Chalon reports Natalie’s account of it in detail in Portrait of a Seductress.

What attracts us and attaches us may heal us, even in an impermanent world, as so beautifully expressed in A General Theory of Love by Thomas Lewis, Fari Amini and Richard Lannon, three doctors exploring the physiology of love in humans. Using different tools to investigate how this works on an every-day level, A.T. Mann’s astrology system has some similarities with the Jungian-inspired system called “Spiritual Tarot” practiced by author and Jungian scholar Geraldine Amaral. They both acknowledge what Mann calls “deeply embedded historical archetypes” that cause resonance when we encounter people who look or sound or act like these archetypes.

What interests A.T. Mann is the durability of this particular affinity. Lily and Natalie never wanted to separate from the moment they met. Had they “met before”? Maybe. Their deepest resonance, based on astrological data, goes way, way back and puts them together in an era before recorded history when hominids coexisted on earth, when scientists believe matriarchy characterized cultures and there was no concept of monogamy.

“Well that sounds about right,” I laughed. Mann laughed with me. Then he offered more food for my imagination. According to his system, he can imagine that both women (Gramont and Barney) shared a resonance with other time periods in specific locations, such Italy in the 1500s. “The core of my astrology system,” Mann told me, “is what the Tibetan Buddhists call ‘dependent origination,’ (the term is pratītyasamutpāda) which means that we never start from nothing, but rather our existence itself is dependent upon earlier conditions over which we have little or no control, and which affect us profoundly throughout our lives. Hence my exploration of these incarnational phenomena, of which yours is a very beautiful and poetic example.”

“Meet me in 1909”

Beautiful and poetic? I’ll take it. I was born today, April 30th. Mann modeled my astrological data and compared it with Lily’s and Natalie’s spirals. Where did it put me? Back with the hominid matriarchs, of course! And that’s not all. Our paths “crossed” again more recently, which may explain a lot about my interest in the Moderns. “Gramont, Barney and you all have Saturn in early Pisces or late Aquarius,” writes Mann, “which is the time from the 1890s to just after 1910.”

Like biographer, like subject? “When we connect to people in history,” Mann writes, “it’s because we’re directed to those people by something inside of us.”

Who knows what to make of it all? But it sure is fun guessing today, on my 50th birthday, as I raise a glass and resonate with their beautiful binary star system, still shining bright on their 115th anniversary.

 

The celestial spiraling of eternal mates

The celestial spiraling of eternal mates

 

formerly a practicing architect, a.t. mann is the author of 20 books on astrology, sacred architecture, sacred gardens, ecological design, sacred sexuality, calendar systems, psychology, healing, tarot, prophecy and reincarnation. learn more at www.atmann.net.
Steeped in the philosophy of carl jung and others, Geraldine Amaral is the author of Tarot Celebrations. learn more at thespritualtarot.com.

The Cruellest Month for Renée Vivien

Apr 25

imagesThe Cruellest Month for Renée Vivien

April is said to be the cruelest month. And so it was for Renée Vivien in 1909, when, towards the end of the month, the poet Lucie Delarue-Mardrus gave a supper party for Natalie Barney that would change Vivien’s life forever. And not for the better.

Forget everything you thought you knew about April in Paris

The biography I’m translating, Élisabeth de Gramont by Francesco Rapazzini, has upended everything I thought I knew about that fateful April in Paris 1909. Shortly after Lucie introduced Barney to her childhood friend Lily de Gramont, the (very married) Marquise de Clermont-Tonnerre, they became lovers like two flames leaping together, “free as fire.” Sexual awakening with a soulmate served up an intensity Lily had never known, one Natalie hadn’t tasted herself…since her starcrossed affair with Vivien.

All through that spring and summer, it was a season of wonder and sensuous delight for Lily. For Renée Vivien, not so much. By July, she would be penniless and hanging on to life by a thread, relying on the sole support of Lily’s cousin, Hélène de Rothschild. In November, she would be dead. Of suicide.

Until now, and for more than 50 years since Élisabeth’s own death, key dates of 1909 and their portentious events were unknown to some of the world’s best belles-lettres biographers.

Rewriting the history of the grandes dames by translating French to English: exciting stuff.

My adventures in translating have also led me to one of Vivien’s more sympathetic and sensitive interpreters, the filmmaker Jane Clark, who wrote and directed a sexy short film about Vivien.

Renée Vivien? Who’s she?

For those of you who don’t know the radical poetry or the tragic legend of Renée Vivien, she was born Pauline Tarn in London in 1876. Her mother was an American from my home state of Michigan. Her father inherited a Scottish merchant legacy and died when Renée was a little girl.

RVTopcoatLg

Renée Vivien (or her  impersonator?)

Having spent the happiest years of her childhood in France, she endured a traumatic adolescence–some of it under lock and key–dominated by her abusive mother until, at 21, Renée finally inherited the fortune that allowed her to return to Paris and dedicate her life to poetry. She wrote exclusively in French. If that wasn’t radical enough, she dressed like Hamlet. Taking it to the limit, she rejected male-dominated institutions and did her best to retire from society that would never accept her uncompromising feminism. This didn’t do much to discourage her fans, so Vivien resorted to hiring impersonators to stand in at her own poetry readings. She translated Sappho from the famous Greek fragments that had only recently been discovered among the rubbish heaps excavated at Oxyrynchus.

In America, her poetry is as unknown today as Sappho’s was then. In France, she’s a big deal.

In 1899, the virginal Vivien met the worldly Natalie Barney at the theatre. It was a coup de foudre. Vivien knew right away her life would never be the same.

It wasn’t. The lively Barney, already a master of the seductive arts and sciences at 24, was reeling from a scandalous grande passion with the Angelina Jolie of her era, the courtesan Liane de Pougy. Basically, Barney had just been dumped by the world’s most desirable woman. Turns out, Pougy had not wanted to be saved from prostitution after all. Barney wasn’t just heartbroken. She was humiliated.

Unknown-1

Liane de Pougy: the Angelina Jolie of 1899.

But where does a young Don Juan go after Angelina Jolie? Such were Barney’s thoughts, clutching the “Dear John” letter while riding through the Bois de Boulogne in her coach, when Renée began to recite one of her poems. Beauty in all its forms would always get Barney’s complete attention. And so it did that day in 1899.

Now she put heart and soul into redirecting what biographer Diana Souhami calls Vivien’s “longing to be dead.” The two young women began their mismatched love affair in dizzying purity with poetry on their lips, kneeling before one another in a room stuffed with blazing candles and overblown lilies. But Barney’s faithless passion had awakened more than puppy love in Vivien, who was already a chloral hydrate addict by that time. I have never seen the edgy, impetuous, dangerous side of Viven’s character portrayed so well as how it is channeled, rather than merely acted, by Traci Dinwiddie in THE TOUCH. Necar Zadegan does a good job with Kérimé Turkhan Pasha, too. Their chemistry is incredible. You can rent the eight-minute film here for a nominal fee on Filmbinder.

Past is prologue
Unknown

Traci Dinwiddie is uncanny as Renée Vivien in THE TOUCH by filmmaker Jane Clark

Los Angeles-based writer/director Jane Clark is also the producer behind the longest screen kiss in film history. While making gritty, topical films like that one (ELENA UNDONE, dir. Nicole Conn 2010) and METH HEAD, now touring the festival circuit, she seeks out character-driven stories in all genres, including romance. One of my favorite genres, too. Clark predicts it will soon undergo a major resurgence, with possibilities opening up in all directions as younger audiences bring their broadened minds to the movies along with their buying power. Will that mean more (and better!?) period dramas and romances about The Lost Generation and their forebears? I hope so.

I’ll publish my conversation with Jane Clark in the days to come. In the meantime, I hope you enjoy THE TOUCH. It’s a slice of life gone by: a furtive meeting in Paris, a moment of stolen passion that took place between a besotted poet and a beautiful Turkish Vizier’s wife living in seclusion in 1906. (Kérimé’s husband, Turkhan Pasha, formerly Foreign Minister of the Ottoman Empire, had come to Paris in 1899 as head of the Turkish delegation to the Peace Conference that followed the Treaty of Paris.) Jane Clark bases her film on this gorgeous, sexy poem. It out-Beaus Beaudelaire, don’t you think?

The Touch
The trees have kept some lingering sun in their branches,
Veiled like a woman, evoking another time.
The twilight passes, weeping. My fingers climb,
Trembling, provocative, the line of your haunches.
My ingenious fingers wait when they have found
The petal flesh beneath the robe they part.
How curious, complex, the touch, this subtle art—
As the dream of fragrance, the miracle of sound.
I follow slowly the graceful contours of your hips,
The curve of your shoulders, your neck, your unappeased breasts.
In your white voluptuousness my desire rests,
Swooning, refusing itself the kisses of your lips.
–Renée Vivien

April in Paris, Chestnuts in Blossom

Apr 23

stroh-header2insetphoto

Years of Plenty

Memoirist Élisabeth de Gramont, born this day in 1875

April 23 is the birthday Élisabeth de Gramont was forced to share with William Shakespeare, and as far as I can tell, she never held it against him. Today is Shakespeare’s 450th birthday, Lily’s 139th. What’s an age gap of 311 years to an old soul descended from Henri IV? “Why,” I can almost hear her say, “we’re almost contemporaries!”

Lily de Gramont covers three centuries with grace and aplomb in her 1931 memoir, Years of Plenty, still fresh today. (New York: Jonathan Cape, 1931, 364 pp.) I just finished reading it, and I’m so glad I did.

I prefer admiring when possible, or else taking no notice.

–Élisabeth de Gramont, Years of Plenty

Years of Plenty is volume two of Lily’s four best-selling memoirs that came on the heels of her 1920 lifestyle classic, Almanach des bonnes choses de France. Chronicling Parisian life from around the turn of the century to the eve of World War I, it was published in French as Chestnuts in Blossom, perfect for April in Paris. So join me for a stroll through the Gilded Age down along the Seine. We’ll meet racehorse owners, writers, painters, poets, politicians, collectors, composers and “some famous foreigners”: pretty much everybody who was anybody in the capital of Europe.

Raised in wealth and privilege then left virtually penniless to raise two daughters after divorcing her husband in 1920, Lily earned her living with her pen. She was an astute and sensitive social observer with high energy. She aimed for a state of perpetual becoming. The key was fulfilling an insatiable appetite for people, places, things and sensual experiences. Her “eternal mate,” Natalie Barney, said she had a sixth sense for pleasure. As a young bride she wanders through Belle Époque Tunis like Cavafy in a corset, commenting on the “lovely lowered lashes” of the handsome youths in the Jewish quarter. She breaks off her sittings with Boldini when she realizes she “would have to pay one way or another.” Discretion must be maintained. She greedily eavesdrops on a reported scene of Sapphic seduction, with poet Renée Vivien carrying a woman up four flights of stairs, then halts the gossip when she learns Vivien is being “sumptuously kept” by another woman. The other woman is her cousin. She leaves that part out.

"One cannot have rugs and create things of beauty at the same time"--Edgar Degas

“One cannot have rugs and create things of beauty at the same time”–Edgar Degas

The “Ex-Duchesse de Clermont-Tonnerre” was as much a tastemaker as a social arbiter. The worst thing about poet-adventurer Gabriele d’Annunzio wasn’t his vanity, his profligacy, his womanizing or his facism; it was his poor taste in masquerading as a soldier. I found myself sharing the author’s impressions as if she were walking and talking beside me, not dead since 1954. She records styles that never go out of fashion and events that are either back in the news, or else they never left. “A few years ago,” for instance, Lily reports on art auctions, “Asia was being drained of its finest things by France.” Today the reverse is true, and our discussion would be totally au courant. On whether women need more confidence, the subject of a new best-selling book by Katty Kay and Claire Shipman, Lily de Gramont didn’t need three waves of feminism to teach her that confident women are “propped up in life by substantial realities.” And there are lots of other great homeland security tips in Years of Plenty: “Moral: if you have over three hundred guests, don’t leave your things lying about the house.” Or this helpful advice from her friend Edgar Degas: “one cannot have rugs and create things of beauty at the same time.”

Élisabeth is a beautiful writer because she worshipped beautiful writing from childhood. She spent much of the life of her mind on “imaginary snowy peaks reserved to poets; up there, each fresh snowfall awaits the imprint of new steps.” At 34 in 1909, she was the first to translate Keats into French. She used to carry the poems of Stéphane Mallarmé stuffed in her handbag; when she learned of his death, it was “a catastrophe.” The first living author she ever met was a memoirist; she was shy but undaunted by his Sixty Years of Recollections. The Norman poet Lucie Delarue-Mardrus was a childhood friend, and Lucie’s friend Marcel Proust soon became another one. Soon, Lily found that she was beginning to recognize the addresses of fictional characters in the streets of Paris. In a hilarious portrait of the Greek-born poet Anna de Noailles, Lily pokes fun at them both, reporting a complaint from a society hostess: “She comes in reciting Plutarch! I won’t have that sort of thing in my house!”

Eugène Boudin: "the painter who made the wind visible."

Eugène Boudin on the Norman coast: “the painter who succeeded in making the wind visible.”

It’s the sensitive and soulful Lily de Gramont who touches me in this volume. I understand her lifelong love for Normandy (Hornfleur in particular) when she writes of Boudin as “the painter who succeeded in making the wind visible.” I understand her when she writes of Monet as a scientist and tells us that the water-lily ponds at Giverny were “a whole world of colonies and reflections that had been waiting to be painted until he came.” Rodin “practically invented the way to join bodies,” even though Lily’s friend Georges Clemenceau complained that Rodin made him look like a Japanese General. Entranced by the paintings of Van Gogh, “lemon juice must have been squeezed over that man’s palette to acidify his colours.”

This is the politically active daughter of a princess, a woman who was a Marxist from youth yet accepted her good fortune and couldn’t put her finger on what was wrong with Europe during the summer of 1914. She kept being “struck by the thought: It cannot last. Something’s about to happen.” Filled with foreboding, she left Paris for Marly. “I had a key to the forest, a huge, ponderous, rusty key which opened one of the massive Louis XIV portals leading to wide lawns and groves of lofty old trees. . . . All the structures of Marly put together, for which the King was so severely censured, cost exactly, in our money, the price of a day of war.”

In this memoir filled with grandees, geniuses and modern masters, the author sees them like the moon, either waxing or waning, rarely new or full.

Thoroughly modern: Sketch for portrait by Romaine Brooks, whose rooftop dancing Elisabeth critiques in Years of Plenty

Thoroughly modern: Sketch for portrait by Romaine Brooks, whose rooftop dancing Élisabeth critiques in Years of Plenty

And she’s funny. She describes the Eiffel tower as a soil deposit, leaving it up to us to decide its chemical makeup. She admits that she coveted a few Van Gogh paintings, but his dealer “Hessel did not want to sell them to me, probably because it would have been hard for me to pay for them.” Isadora Duncan comes over for dinner with her new husband, Serge Essenin, who speaks no French. Drinking hard, he recites a long poem in Russian “which is, it seems, magnificent.” The only two words Lily can understand are lupanar (bordello) and syphilis. On vice: “Everybody has at least one—the English call them hobbies.” A male friend “rises so early that it must be to go to bed elsewhere,” which was also the habit of the woman she loved, Natalie Barney.

All her long life that spanned two world wars (she died at 79), Élisabeth de Gramont admired books that “explained woman’s mystery at a time when she still had some.”

She still has some.

Many happy returns of April 23, Madame. Your laughter is my string of pearls.

 

My own favorite racing picture: "The Apprentice Jockey" by Alfred Munnings

My own favorite racing picture: “The Apprentice Jockey” by Alfred Munnings

“Racecourses”

I live in a horsey country village flocked on the outskirts by some of the world’s loveliest training tracks—both flat and cross-country—still in private ownership. For ten springtimes I had the luxury of waking before dawn (if I could be bothered—anyone who knows me knows I am hardly a “morning person,” even on a mountainside) and taking a thermos down the road a quarter of a mile to stand at the fence and watch gallops on one of them. Nothing like it. The pounding of hooves at arm’s length wakes you more suddenly than any steaming cup of coffee. From that vantage point, you’ve never seen a tenderer sunrise. I’m not ashamed to say I’ve wept there on the rail on a few. One of the many reasons I’d never live anywhere else.

Middleburg, Virginia is a racing town electrified every April, and so I particularly enjoyed Lily’s chapter on “Racecourses.” Her father the Duc de Gramont kept racehorses at Glisolles in Normandy, and so she knew them well enough, although she admitted once to Baron Foy that she got bored trying to remember pedigrees, new rules and the latest in council politics. Writing in 1929, Lily counted more than ten newspapers devoted to horse racing, “as well as a page in every big daily…. Monday at Saint-Cloud, Tuesday at Enghien, Wednesday at Tremblay, Thursday at Auteuil, Friday at Maisons-Laffitte, Saturday at Vincennes and Sunday at Longchamp.”

Ah, those were the days, when Proust’s and Lily’s friend Robert de Montesquiou rued that he hadn’t been fitted by his Creator to be a stud horse. “When the intellectual looks on while a stud enjoys a triumph,” wrote Lily, “he perhaps envies such immediate and visible glory.”

Unknown-4Perhaps???  Indeed he does, Madame! Most everyone in Middleburg would agree. Here’s to those “colorful gleams in the fog” that awaken all the mornings of the world.

 

Poem: Proof (6:11)

Apr 23

wisteria

Unknown-1NOBLE SPIRITS

Cognac’s Golden Ratio

April 23 is the birthday of Epicurean author, sculptor and political activist Elisabeth de Gramont (1875-1954), who made the first French translations of poems by John Keats.

Somebody once asked Lily de Gramont how to translate literature. She said that the artistry’s in imagining how the author would express herself, were she speaking in one’s own language. Translating Francesco Rapazzini’s biography of Lily, I like to keep that in mind.

And so today in memoriam I offer a poem of my own. It’s one that refreshes Keats’ Ode on a Grecian Urn, much beloved by young Lily de Gramont. A poem about the power of inspiration for a modern Epicurean who appreciates a timeless recipe. In seventeenth century France, Cognac was distilled from six parts wine and eleven parts water.

“Claret is the liquor for boys, port for men,” said Samuel Johnson, “but he who aspires to be a hero must drink brandy.” Here’s raising a glass to Elisabeth de Gramont on her 139th birthday. Many happy returns, Madame.

Proof (6:11)

He’s gone and she’s proof
that nothing ever really ends.
Just gets turned over in the soil
between her toes: radiance in her smile
warming the field she walks in.
Turns over in the soil
season after season: proof of life
to those tilling behind her,
furrows so full of it all.

She’s proof and she knows
that she’s a love child.

He’s gone and he never went
anywhere. She knows it for sure
cause she’s proof.
Proof of his generosity.
He’s her breath of air and fire,
he’s her long tall drink of water,
and when she’s on his good footing
he’s the she she’s always
steadied her life upon.

Yep, she’s proof enough
of the golden ratio.
Of new roots spreading
and new shoots sprouting.
Of fusty old poems aerating
and lost rivers refreshing.
‘Ere she walks, the sweet grapes grow.
Beauty’s truth and truth beauty.
That’s all she knows in this life
and all she needs to know.

© 2014 by Suzanne Stroh
All rights reserved

Poem: Early April

Apr 1

april-poem

 

images-1Snow on cherry blossom.
The snake eludes the young hawk.
The light flurries drift in powder clouds
like glittering smoke from wood fires.
A lone cello in the music room.
The season balks; the teacher practices.
Real spring–when will it come?

 

© 2014 SUZANNE STROH
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

Poem: Your Mother and I

Mar 31

imagesDeath Valley

 

 

 

 

Your Mother and I

Your mother and I
keep spaces between us.
We travel together
on separate schedules.
Our love is like a Roman
goddess. She’s elusive in Latin
and yet she endures.

One way we know our love
is how we miss you equally.
It comes in waves
like sphere after sphere
of the fragrance I fly through
on my silver chariot
racing for the full moon
on the silvery, sage-carpeted
California desert.

Your mother and I
will find no time tonight
to drink to her success in Hollywood.
And so I kneel down
in boots and helmet
and take some sand at sundown
and watch it slip through my fingers,
white and pure,
like time fleeting
with our daughter.

Unknown

 

 

 

 

© 2014 Suzanne Stroh
All rights reserved